We present a procedure designed to standardize input received during faculty searches with the goal of amplifying student voices. The framework was originally used for feedback from graduate students, but it can be adapted easily to collect feedback from other stakeholders.

The AAS Journals offer a wide variety of ways for authors to improve the impact of their articles. Analysis of citation statistics for recently published articles shows that providing data and utilizing enhanced graphics is an excellent way to improve your article's influence.

We describe best practices for early career researchers to develop an effective and fair approach to refereeing manuscripts.

We describe the infrastructure developed at the NASA Astrophysics Data System that implements a software citation detection, metadata capture and ingest, and event-driven notification system, highlighting challenges to promoting software into first-class research objects.

We present an analysis of the distributed peer review process used to assess the majority of proposals submitted to the ALMA Cycle 8 Main Call. This process was implemented to overcome the challenge of increasingly unsustainable reviewer workloads in traditional panel reviews.

NASA recently ran a ground-breaking experiment requiring submission of Inclusion Plans with ATP research proposals. Preliminary analysis of themes in submitted plans and a comparison of the reviews by both science and inclusion expert panels are presented by Sacco and Norman.