State of the Profession Considerations for Laboratory Astrophysics
by Daniel Wolf Savin, James F. Babb, Paul Barklem, Paul M. Bellan, Gabriele Betancourt-Martinez, Jürgen Blum, Christiaan Boersma, Mark D. Boryta, Julie Brisset, Crystal Brogan, Jan Cami, Paola Caselli, Ara Chutjian, Lia Corrales, Kyle Crabtree, Gerardo Dominguez, Steven R. Federman, Christopher J. Fontes, Richard Freedman, Lisseth Gavilan-Marin, Brad Gibson, Leon Golub, Thomas W. Gorczyca, Michael Hahn, Dieter Hartmann, Sarah M. Hörst, Reggie L. Hudson, Hantao Ji, Holger Kreckel, Jeffrey Kuhn, James E. Lawler, Timothy J. Lee, Maurice A. Leutenegger, Roberto Mancini, Joan P. Marler, Lyudmila I. Mashonkina, Michael C. McCarthy, Martin McCoustra, Brett A. McGuire, Stefanie N. Milam, Mike Montgomery, Nicholas A. Murphy, Gillian Nave, Robert M. Nelson, Kenneth M. Nollett, Aimee A. Norton, Oldřich Novotný, Anthony Papol, John C. Raymond, Farid Salama, Ella M. Sciamma-O'Brien, Randall Smith, Chad Sosolik, Clara Sousa-Silva, Artemis Spyrou, Phillip C. Stancil, Keeyoon Sung, Jonathan Tennyson, Frank Timmes, Virginia L. Trimble, Olivia Venot, Glenn Wahlgren, Bradford J. Wargelin, Don Winget, and Michael P. Wood
Published onSep 30, 2019
State of the Profession Considerations for Laboratory Astrophysics
·
Abstract
Astrophysics advances, in part, through laboratory astrophysics studies of the underlying processes controlling the observed properties of the Cosmos. These studies encompass both theoretical and experimental research. Robust support for laboratory astrophysics is critically needed to maximize the scientific return of astronomical observations.
The full text of this article is only available in PDF format:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
