by Karen O'Neil, Felix J Lockman, Filippo D'Ammando, Will Armentrout, Shami Chatterjee, Jim Cordes, Martin Cordiner, David Frayer, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Natalia Lewandowska, Duncan Lorimer, Brian Mason, Maura McLaughlin, Tony Mroczkowski, Hooshang Nayyeri, Eric Perlman, Bindu Rani, Dominik Riechers, Martin Sahlen, Ian Stephens, Patrick Taylor, and Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro
Published onSep 30, 2019
The Case for a Fully Funded Green Bank Telescope
·
Abstract
The NSF has reduced its funding for peer-reviewed use on the GBT to ~3900 hours/year, 60% of available science time. This greatly increases the telescope pressure & fragments the schedule, making it very difficult to allocate time for even the highest rated projects planned for the next decade. Here we seek funding for 1500 more hours annually.
The full text of this article is only available in PDF format:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
